The DARB Insurance Services Blog

October 24, 2008

Bankruptcy and D&O

Filed under: Directors and Officers — Administrator @ 10:59 pm

There are many ways that the insolvency of an insured may impact their Directors and Officers Coverage. These issues may ultimately force insurance companies to forfeit their contractual rights, and, directors may potentially find themselves paying for their own defense costs.

The main issue revolves around the retention and which coverage (Side-A or Side-B) is triggered. So, lets examine this issue a bit further. In the event of a bankruptcy, Side-A coverage may be triggered- which is not subject to retention. In this case, insolvency may circumvent the applicable retention. This is important since the policy terms may require an insured to pay the retention as a condition precedent to the insurance coverage. On the other hand, if the D&O policy allows for presumptive indemnification in which the Side-A coverage is not married to the indemnification, Side-B coverage may be triggered. And, this may leave the directors and officers to fund the retention personally.

As such, courts tend to focus on the retention language in the policy, as well as the statutory laws governing liability insurance.

October 19, 2008

Governor signs AB 2956

Filed under: Life In General, News — Administrator @ 10:58 pm

California Governor Schwarzenegger recently signed AB 2956 into law. The bill clarifies the differences between a broker and an agent. Brokers are supposed to act on behalf of the consumer while an agent acts on behalf of the insurance company. As such, this bill establishes four situations in which the broker presumption is rebutted:
1. When the insurance company has appointed the licensee as its agent and filed a notice of the appointment with the California Department of Insurance
2. When the insurer confers binding authority
3. When the insurance company allows the licensee to appoint other licensees as agents
4. When the insurer confers the authority to pay claims on behalf of the consumer

Additionally, the bill requires that all brokers disclose their fees in a written agreement signed the consumer and/or insured party.

October 16, 2008

Common Clauses and Endorsements

Filed under: Life In General — Administrator @ 10:53 pm

Protection Maintenance Clause- Alarm System in Working Order and in the “On” Position When Premises Closed
Personal Conveyance Clause- When the Property Insured is Being Personally Conveyed It is to Remain in the Close Personal Care, Custody, and Control, and Within Sight of the Assured and/or Assured’s Employee(s) and/or Representative at All Times
Mandatory Rate Change Endorsement- Rates subject to change if ordered by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California pursuant to section 11737 of the California Insurance Code
Premium Adjustment Endorsement- Right to adjust premium if the benefits are effected by legislative or regulatory changes adopted after policy issuance

October 14, 2008

The Surplus Lines Market

Filed under: General Liability, Property, Surplus Lines or Nonadmitted — Administrator @ 10:52 pm

The Suplus Lines insurers, or non-admitted carriers, are an important because they offer coverages that cannot be procured through the traditional admitted carrier market. Epitomized by Lloyd’s of London, this market can conduct business legally as long as that business is conducted within the parameters put forth by the state. Additionally, many states publish an approved list of approved Surplus Lines carriers for their state. In the case of Lloyd’s, it is an approved list of syndicates.

Although these parameters can vary from state to state, in general, three conditions must be met:
a) The policy must be obtained through a licensed Surplus Lines Carrier.
b) It must be determined through a diligent search that the needed insurance cannot be obtained through an admitted carrier.
c) Coverage cannot be obtained for the sole purpose of getting a lower premium or better contract than what was offered by an admitted carrier.

October 10, 2008

Collateral Obligations and the Credit Crunch

Filed under: Life In General — Administrator @ 10:51 pm

Collateral Obligations and the Credit Crunch
Securing collateral for a deductible insurance program can be a daunting task in a tightening credit market. And, posting collateral for insurance requirements can pose a serious burden on any company affecting both your cash flow and borrowing capacity. The good news is that there are a number of alternative strategies that an entity can implement to deal with the problem.

But first, lets discuss the reasons for the collateral requirement. Under a typical deductible insurance program, the insurer agrees to pay for all legitimate claims upfront. The insurer then goes to the insured for reimbursement on the claims that fall beneath the deductible limit. This clearly creates a credit exposure for the insurer. And since Insurance companies are constantly being rated for their credit exposure, they must maintain a certain level of collateral for their statuatory reporting requirements. As an additional factor, liability exposures can be long term exposures, hense their potential losses are often based an an actuarial estimate. As such, insurance companies must protect themselves from their insureds failure to pay. Thus, the need for a collateral requirement.

So, how does this relate to the current credit crisis? Well, clearly, an insurance carriers financial stress will not improve any insured’s existing collateral terms. And right now most insurers are evaluating their portfolios, as well as certain classes of business, since in this tightened market, companies are at an increased risk of their clients defaulting on the payment of their upfront deductibles. These defaults can be either a delay in payment or bankruptcy. Regardless, they add stress to the whole system.

So, what can be done? The first option is to create a program that has a self-insured retention. This would make the insurer not responsible for the losses that fall within that retention. This is the most common strategy since a program that includes a self-insured retention eliminates the need for collateral in the first place.

Since collateral is based on structure, expected deductible losses and financial charecteristics, there are other options to consider that deal with these three items directly. So, the creation of a collateral agreement can include negotiating the future timing of obligations, pricing considerations, and paid loss credit. Since these terms are, in gerneral, rather complicated, they should always be spelled out and clearly documented in the insuring agreement.

As an insured, it is necessary for you to examine these issues more carefully with an experienced, licensed and knowledgable broker. And, now more than ever, it is imperative to analyze your collateral terms and do what you can to preserve your business’ cash flow.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress